PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFED vs. CHGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFED vs. CHGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFED achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than CHGX's 20.18% return.


IFED

1D
-1.62%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-4.64%
6M
-5.76%
1Y
-0.20%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
10Y*

CHGX

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.23%
YTD
20.18%
6M
18.64%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFED vs. CHGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-4.64%15.02%23.04%20.78%-1.46%8.46%
CHGX
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
20.18%12.13%15.16%23.65%-21.77%4.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IFED and CHGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.83

The correlation between IFED and CHGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFED vs. CHGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CHGX
CHGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFED vs. CHGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFEDCHGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.33

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

3.32

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

12.70

-12.73

IFED vs. CHGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFED Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the CHGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFED and CHGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFED vs. CHGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFED drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum CHGX drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFED and CHGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEDCHGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-35.49%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.65%

-8.50%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

-18.09%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.60%

-2.50%

-4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-6.40%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

2.22%

+3.68%

Volatility

IFED vs. CHGX - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) at 6.11%. This indicates that IFED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEDCHGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

6.11%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

11.74%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.90%

14.53%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.92%

17.73%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

19.38%

+0.54%

IFED vs. CHGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFED has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CHGX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFED vs. CHGX - Dividend Comparison

IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHGX
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
0.56%0.67%0.76%0.94%1.11%0.56%0.58%0.86%0.00%0.59%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFED and CHGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFED has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to CHGX (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFED dropped -22.36% vs CHGX's -35.49%.

On 3-year performance, CHGX leads with 19.63% vs 15.90% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CHGX has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CHGX has performed better with a 19.63% return vs 15.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CHGX.

CHGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

IFED is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CHGX is Large Cap Growth Equities. IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CHGX tracks Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Change Finance. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IFED and 0.49% for CHGX.

CHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFED and CHGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer