PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESC vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IESC vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 92.75% return, which is significantly higher than VRT's 86.99% return.


IESC

1D
2.53%
1M
9.91%
YTD
92.75%
6M
62.95%
1Y
186.31%
3Y*
139.60%
5Y*
70.53%
10Y*
48.97%

VRT

1D
1.68%
1M
-18.35%
YTD
86.99%
6M
87.85%
1Y
173.26%
3Y*
138.33%
5Y*
63.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESC vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
92.75%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-10.89%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
86.99%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and VRT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.40

The correlation between IESC and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IESC:

$15.14B

VRT:

$118.76B

EPS

IESC:

$18.85

VRT:

$3.99

PE Ratio

IESC:

39.78

VRT:

75.98

PEG Ratio

IESC:

0.48

VRT:

0.33

PS Ratio

IESC:

4.17

VRT:

10.92

PB Ratio

IESC:

14.11

VRT:

27.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

IESC:

$3.63B

VRT:

$10.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IESC:

$931.31M

VRT:

$3.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

IESC:

$487.14M

VRT:

$2.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESC vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESCVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.09

6.55

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.98

17.79

+5.18

IESC vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESC vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESCVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.32%

-71.24%

-27.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.80%

-25.32%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.23%

-61.28%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.22%

-71.24%

+17.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-19.50%

+19.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.97%

-16.23%

-38.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.66%

9.30%

-1.64%

Volatility

IESC vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) have volatilities of 15.69% and 16.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESCVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.69%

16.12%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.65%

45.82%

+4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.74%

58.29%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.09%

61.88%

-7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.19%

54.61%

-6.42%

Dividends

IESC vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

IESC vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IES Holdings, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
974.20M
2.65B
(IESC) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IESC vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IES Holdings, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
24.5%
37.7%
Portfolio components
IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IESC and VRT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to IESC (15.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESC and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer