IESC vs. PG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, IESC returned 48.97%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IESC vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESC achieves a 92.75% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IESC has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 48.97%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.

IESC

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 10.63%
• YTD: 92.75%
• 6M: 62.95%
• 1Y: 175.21%
• 3Y*: 139.60%
• 5Y*: 70.53%
• 10Y*: 48.97%

PG

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: -5.68%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 4.73%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IESC vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	92.75%	93.58%	153.67%	122.72%	-29.76%	9.99%	79.42%	65.02%	-9.86%	-9.92%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	5.93%	-12.26%	17.25%	-0.86%	-5.05%	20.52%	14.15%	39.70%	3.57%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IESC and PG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1998	0.10

The correlation between IESC and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (3 years) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap IESC : $15.14B PG : $361.53B
EPS IESC : $18.85 PG : $5.23
PE Ratio IESC : 39.78 PG : 28.63
PEG Ratio IESC : 0.48 PG : 7.00
PS Ratio IESC : 4.17 PG : 4.20
PB Ratio IESC : 14.11 PG : 6.70
Total Revenue (TTM) IESC : $3.63B PG : $86.72B
Gross Profit (TTM) IESC : $931.31M PG : $43.64B
EBITDA (TTM) IESC : $487.14M PG : $22.63B

Return for Risk

IESC vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IESC

IESC Risk / Return Rank: 93
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 90
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 97

PG

PG Risk / Return Rank: 28
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IESC vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IESC	PG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	-0.30	+3.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	-0.31	+3.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.97	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.09	-0.37	+8.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.98	-0.68	+23.66

IESC vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESC Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESC and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IESC vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESC drawdown since its inception was -98.32%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESC and PG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IESC	PG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.32%	-54.25%	-44.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.80%	-15.52%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.23%	-21.15%	-28.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.22%	-23.77%	-30.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.28%	-23.77%	-30.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-13.29%	+13.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.97%	-12.16%	-42.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.66%	8.80%	-1.14%

Volatility

IESC vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.99%. This indicates that IESC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IESC	PG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.69%	6.99%	+8.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.65%	15.01%	+35.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.74%	18.78%	+43.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.09%	17.82%	+36.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.19%	19.05%	+29.14%

Dividends

IESC vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IESC IES Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	2.85%	2.91%	2.36%	2.55%	2.38%	2.08%	2.24%	2.37%	3.09%	2.98%	3.18%	3.31%

Financials

IESC vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IES Holdings, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IESC and PG in my portfolio?

IESC and PG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IESC or PG?

IESC has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESC dropped -98.32% vs PG's -54.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.