IEMG vs. RING

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 10.42%/yr vs 13.85%/yr for RING. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.

Performance

IEMG vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly higher than RING's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 10.42%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.

IEMG

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 3.87%
• YTD: 22.84%
• 6M: 25.59%
• 1Y: 44.83%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

RING

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: -8.50%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -4.18%
• 1Y: 54.08%
• 3Y*: 44.87%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	22.84%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-5.54%	164.72%	15.98%	12.29%	-15.40%	-7.46%	24.98%	49.92%	-13.14%	10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and RING is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012	0.30

The correlation between IEMG and RING shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEMG vs. RING - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEMG	RING
Technology	42.1%	-
Financial Services	16.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	-
Industrials	8.0%	-
Basic Materials	6.3%	100.0%
Communication Services	5.6%	-
Energy	3.3%	-
Healthcare	3.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.9%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

IEMG vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 73
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 36
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IEMG	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.20	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.62	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.23	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	1.59	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.89	4.45	+7.44

IEMG vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMG	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-79.47%	+40.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	-35.72%	+22.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.21%	-35.72%	+18.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.75%	-47.94%	+12.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.71%	-52.04%	+13.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.98%	-30.03%	+26.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-47.36%	+34.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	12.74%	-9.15%

Volatility

IEMG vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is 10.60%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that IEMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMG	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.60%	16.83%	-6.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.89%	39.11%	-20.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.08%	47.31%	-26.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.73%	36.81%	-18.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.17%	36.70%	-16.53%

IEMG vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEMG vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than RING's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.24%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.89%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMG and RING in my portfolio?

IEMG and RING have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEMG or RING?

RING has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to IEMG (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs RING's -79.47%.

Which ETF is better, IEMG or RING?

On 10-year performance, RING leads with 13.85% vs 10.42% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 10.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IEMG or RING?

Over the 10-year period, RING has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEMG or RING?

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RING.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IEMG or RING?

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.89% for RING.

What is the main difference between IEMG and RING?

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while RING is Gold. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.39% for RING.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.