PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 19.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 8.95%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.


IEMG

1D
-0.35%
1M
-2.49%
6M
11.50%
YTD
19.91%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
8.95%
ALL TIME*
6.33%

SPY

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.46%
6M
12.78%
YTD
13.49%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
15.27%
ALL TIME*
10.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$884.12M$963.51M$1.09B
$41.99B$36.81B$39.78B

IEMG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
19.91%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
13.49%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and SPY is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.70

The correlation between IEMG and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (5 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEMG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMG
SPY

Technology

43.6%
36.9%

Financial Services

17.3%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
8.9%

Industrials

7.7%
7.6%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.9%

Communication Services

5.6%
9.7%

Healthcare

3.2%
9.4%

Energy

3.0%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.8%

Utilities

1.9%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.0%

Technology

IEMG
43.6%
SPY
36.9%

Financial Services

IEMG
17.3%
SPY
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMG
7.7%
SPY
8.9%

Industrials

IEMG
7.7%
SPY
7.6%

Basic Materials

IEMG
5.8%
SPY
1.9%

Communication Services

IEMG
5.6%
SPY
9.7%

Healthcare

IEMG
3.2%
SPY
9.4%

Energy

IEMG
3.0%
SPY
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

IEMG
2.8%
SPY
4.8%

Utilities

IEMG
1.9%
SPY
2.6%

Real Estate

IEMG
1.5%
SPY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEMG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.71

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

11.55

-3.83

IEMG vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-55.19%

+16.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.78%

-8.88%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-18.76%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-24.50%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-33.72%

-4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

-0.20%

-6.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-9.01%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

2.08%

+2.47%

Volatility

IEMG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.10%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

4.10%

+4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.80%

10.32%

+11.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.82%

12.88%

+10.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

17.21%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

17.96%

+2.37%

IEMG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.25%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and SPY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to SPY (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.27% vs 8.95% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer