IEFA vs. XLP

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFA returned 9.90%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XLP. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.

Performance

IEFA vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 9.90%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.

IEFA

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 9.51%
• 6M: 11.08%
• 1Y: 22.43%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

XLP

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: 6.65%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFA vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF	9.51%	32.08%	3.26%	17.95%	-15.24%	11.63%	8.18%	22.64%	-14.14%	26.57%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	11.10%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and XLP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012	0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between IEFA and XLP has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IEFA vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEFA	XLP
Financial Services	22.6%	-
Industrials	20.1%	-
Technology	11.6%	-
Healthcare	9.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	1.0%
Basic Materials	6.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	99.0%
Communication Services	4.7%	-
Energy	3.6%	-
Utilities	3.5%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-

Return for Risk

IEFA vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFA

IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 44
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 48

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 19
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFA vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IEFA	XLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.59	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	0.94	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.11	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	0.79	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.93	1.52	+5.41

IEFA vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, roughly equal to the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and XLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEFA	XLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.78%	-35.90%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-9.69%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.76%	-12.39%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.41%	-16.30%	-14.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.78%	-24.51%	-10.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-4.12%	+3.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.68%	-7.06%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	5.01%	-1.98%

Volatility

IEFA vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.53%. This indicates that IEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEFA	XLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	4.53%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.11%	10.14%	+2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.54%	12.90%	+2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	13.34%	+3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	14.75%	+2.56%

IEFA vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IEFA vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than XLP's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF	3.24%	3.55%	3.47%	3.20%	2.70%	3.32%	1.90%	3.18%	3.46%	2.57%	2.96%	2.63%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.53%	2.75%	2.77%	2.63%	2.47%	2.28%	2.50%	2.57%	3.04%	2.62%	2.53%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEFA and XLP in my portfolio?

IEFA and XLP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEFA or XLP?

IEFA has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to XLP (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs XLP's -35.90%.

Which ETF is better, IEFA or XLP?

On 10-year performance, IEFA leads with 9.90% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IEFA or XLP?

Over the 10-year period, IEFA has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEFA or XLP?

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IEFA or XLP?

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.53% for XLP.

What is the main difference between IEFA and XLP?

IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.08% for XLP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.