IEFA vs. VLUE
IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFA returned 9.38%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for VLUE. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VLUE.
Performance
IEFA vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 43.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 9.38%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.56% annualized return.
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.38%
VLUE
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 35.25%
- YTD
- 43.48%
- 1Y
- 71.63%
- 3Y*
- 29.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $895.79M | $960.37M | $950.39M | |
| $165.60M | $255.80M | $278.61M |
IEFA vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 9.45% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 26.57% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 43.48% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFA and VLUE is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IEFA and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IEFA vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFA
VLUE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFA
VLUE
Industrials
IEFA
VLUE
Technology
IEFA
VLUE
Healthcare
IEFA
VLUE
Consumer Cyclical
IEFA
VLUE
Consumer Defensive
IEFA
VLUE
Basic Materials
IEFA
VLUE
Energy
IEFA
VLUE
Utilities
IEFA
VLUE
Communication Services
IEFA
VLUE
Real Estate
IEFA
VLUE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFA vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
IEFA
VLUE
IEFA vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEFA | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.61 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 7.98 | -6.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 27.87 | -22.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEFA vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFA | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -39.47% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -9.04% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -17.89% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -27.12% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | -39.47% | +4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -4.86% | +2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -5.99% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.58% | +0.44% |
Volatility
IEFA vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is 4.00%, while iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that IEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFA | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 7.20% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 17.11% | -3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 20.08% | -4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 18.29% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 20.00% | -2.98% |
IEFA vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEFA vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than VLUE's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.41% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.44% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEFA and VLUE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to IEFA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs VLUE's -39.47%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 14.56% vs 9.38% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 14.56% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VLUE.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.44% for VLUE.
IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VLUE is Large Cap Value Equities. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.15% for VLUE.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEFA and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer