PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDX vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDX vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -36.77% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's -1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of -4.45%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


IDX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-21.09%
YTD
-36.77%
6M
-37.78%
1Y
-27.09%
3Y*
-14.02%
5Y*
-9.23%
10Y*
-4.45%

GDXJ

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
-1.65%
6M
7.01%
1Y
65.36%
3Y*
46.18%
5Y*
17.68%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDX vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
-36.77%13.83%-9.75%1.98%-9.40%-2.59%-7.45%6.26%-10.46%19.24%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-1.65%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%-11.02%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IDX and GDXJ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2009

0.28

IDX vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDX
GDXJ

Basic Materials

25.2%
100.0%

Financial Services

25.1%

-

Energy

12.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.0%

-

Communication Services

8.9%

-

Industrials

7.4%

-

Utilities

5.2%

-

Technology

2.6%

-

Healthcare

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

IDX
25.2%
GDXJ
100.0%

Financial Services

IDX
25.1%
GDXJ

-

Energy

IDX
12.5%
GDXJ

-

Consumer Defensive

IDX
9.0%
GDXJ

-

Communication Services

IDX
8.9%
GDXJ

-

Industrials

IDX
7.4%
GDXJ

-

Utilities

IDX
5.2%
GDXJ

-

Technology

IDX
2.6%
GDXJ

-

Healthcare

IDX
1.8%
GDXJ

-

Real Estate

IDX
1.8%
GDXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDX
0.5%
GDXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDX vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDX
IDX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDX vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDXGDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.24

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

2.00

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.07

4.93

-7.00

IDX vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDX Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDX and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDXGDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

1.32

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.43

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

0.30

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.06

+0.08

Drawdowns

IDX vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and GDXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDXGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-88.66%

+25.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.41%

-32.92%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.82%

-32.92%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.77%

-50.99%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.11%

-57.77%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.11%

-28.36%

-28.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.83%

-60.50%

+35.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.07%

13.31%

-0.24%

Volatility

IDX vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) is 8.31%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 16.69%. This indicates that IDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDXGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

16.69%

-8.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.03%

41.33%

-19.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.08%

49.77%

-24.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

41.09%

-20.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.31%

44.05%

-19.74%

IDX vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDX vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than GDXJ's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.37%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
3.29%2.08%4.01%3.62%3.64%1.08%1.66%2.21%2.19%1.85%1.16%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDX and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (16.69%) compared to IDX (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

On 10-year performance, GDXJ leads with 12.98% vs -4.45% for IDX. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, IDX has been the lower-risk option at 8.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 12.98% return vs -4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for IDX.

IDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.37% for GDXJ.

IDX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.52% for GDXJ.

GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDX and GDXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer