IDV vs. XME
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDV returned 10.92%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for XME. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.
Performance
IDV vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 10.92%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.
IDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 35.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
XME
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 86.41%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
IDV vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 13.60% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 23.56% | -10.37% | 19.74% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.32% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and XME is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IDV and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDV vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDV
XME
Financial Services
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
IDV
XME
-
Energy
IDV
XME
Utilities
IDV
XME
-
Communication Services
IDV
XME
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDV
XME
-
Consumer Defensive
IDV
XME
Industrials
IDV
XME
Basic Materials
IDV
XME
Real Estate
IDV
XME
-
Technology
IDV
XME
Healthcare
IDV
-
XME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
XME
IDV vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDV | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 3.84 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 9.58 | +5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDV vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -85.89% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -22.60% | +14.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | -30.47% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | -37.27% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | -61.69% | +19.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -9.33% | +7.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -44.09% | +28.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 9.05% | -6.75% |
Volatility
IDV vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is 4.24%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that IDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 15.26% | -11.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 28.51% | -17.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 36.11% | -23.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 32.84% | -17.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 32.96% | -15.04% |
IDV vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 4.40% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and XME have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to IDV (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 10.92% for IDV. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while XME is Materials. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.35% for XME.
IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDV and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer