PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDV vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDV vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than XME's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 10.14%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.


IDV

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.31%
6M
8.84%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
10.14%
ALL TIME*
4.79%

XME

1D
-0.62%
1M
-16.42%
6M
-21.16%
YTD
-5.54%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
15.15%
ALL TIME*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDV vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
11.48%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-10.37%19.74%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
-5.54%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IDV and XME is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007

0.63

The correlation between IDV and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDV vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDV
XME

Financial Services

33.3%

-

Energy

13.9%
24.0%

Utilities

12.1%

-

Communication Services

9.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
0.7%

Industrials

6.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

5.7%
74.8%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

0.8%
2.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

IDV
33.3%
XME

-

Energy

IDV
13.9%
XME
24.0%

Utilities

IDV
12.1%
XME

-

Communication Services

IDV
9.5%
XME

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDV
8.6%
XME

-

Consumer Defensive

IDV
7.6%
XME
0.7%

Industrials

IDV
6.4%
XME
0.4%

Basic Materials

IDV
5.7%
XME
74.8%

Real Estate

IDV
2.0%
XME

-

Technology

IDV
0.8%
XME
2.2%

Healthcare

IDV

-

XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDV vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDV vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDVXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.16

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.16

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

2.79

+7.95

IDV vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the XME Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDV and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDV vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDVXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.14%

-85.89%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-26.37%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-30.47%

+18.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.19%

-37.27%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.50%

-61.69%

+19.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-26.37%

+22.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-43.97%

+28.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

10.94%

-8.19%

Volatility

IDV vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is 3.29%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that IDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDVXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

8.26%

-4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

28.01%

-16.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

36.42%

-23.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

32.67%

-17.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

32.86%

-15.25%

IDV vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDV vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than XME's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
5.33%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.38%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDV and XME have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to IDV (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 15.15% vs 10.14% for IDV. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 0.38% for XME.

IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while XME is Materials. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.35% for XME.

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDV and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer