IDV vs. POW
IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. IDV is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
IDV vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.
IDV
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
POW
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -13.79%
- 6M
- 25.01%
- YTD
- 35.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDV vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 11.69% | 6.87% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 35.68% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDV and POW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDV vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
IDV
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDV vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDV vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.14% | -20.28% | -49.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -20.28% | +16.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -4.56% | -10.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility
IDV vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.20% | 33.06% | -19.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 33.06% | -17.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 33.06% | -15.45% |
IDV vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDV vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 5.32% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDV and POW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.32%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for IDV and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer