PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDOG vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDOG vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDOG achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IDOG has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 11.26%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.


IDOG

1D
-0.39%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
10.07%
6M
10.27%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
11.26%

ENFR

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
24.93%
6M
25.03%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDOG vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
10.07%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
24.93%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IDOG and ENFR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between IDOG and ENFR has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IDOG vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDOG
ENFR

Industrials

12.2%
3.4%

Financial Services

11.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

10.2%

-

Energy

10.1%
98.5%

Communication Services

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%

-

Utilities

9.6%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%

-

Technology

9.1%

-

Healthcare

8.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

IDOG
12.2%
ENFR
3.4%

Financial Services

IDOG
11.3%
ENFR
0.1%

Basic Materials

IDOG
10.2%
ENFR

-

Energy

IDOG
10.1%
ENFR
98.5%

Communication Services

IDOG
9.8%
ENFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDOG
9.6%
ENFR

-

Utilities

IDOG
9.6%
ENFR
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

IDOG
9.1%
ENFR

-

Technology

IDOG
9.1%
ENFR

-

Healthcare

IDOG
8.9%
ENFR

-

Real Estate

IDOG

-

ENFR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDOG vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDOG vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDOGENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

3.23

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.97

8.24

+7.72

IDOG vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDOG and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDOG vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDOG drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDOG and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDOGENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-68.28%

+30.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.64%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-15.58%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-20.29%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-62.64%

+25.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-4.71%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-15.94%

+8.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.38%

-1.47%

Volatility

IDOG vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) is 4.87%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that IDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDOGENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

5.69%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

11.60%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

14.86%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

19.25%

-3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

24.68%

-7.50%

IDOG vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDOG vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

IDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than ENFR's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.02%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.47%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDOG and ENFR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to IDOG (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDOG dropped -37.32% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.98% vs 11.26% for IDOG. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 4.02% for ENFR.

IDOG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IDOG and 0.35% for ENFR.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDOG and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer