PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDNA vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDNA vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDNA achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.


IDNA

1D
-2.18%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
9.51%
6M
10.53%
1Y
41.74%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
-8.26%
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDNA vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
9.51%17.26%-0.72%-7.63%-42.28%-3.98%54.30%20.83%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IDNA and TLT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.09

The correlation between IDNA and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDNA vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDNA
IDNA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDNA vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDNATLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

0.51

+1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

0.80

+1.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

0.65

+3.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.79

1.63

+10.16

IDNA vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDNA and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDNATLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

0.51

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

-0.40

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.26

-0.16

Drawdowns

IDNA vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDNA drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDNA and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDNATLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.26%

-48.35%

-19.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-7.58%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.73%

-19.18%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.26%

-43.70%

-24.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.01%

-40.44%

-5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.24%

-13.82%

-22.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

3.04%

+0.66%

Volatility

IDNA vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.76%. This indicates that IDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDNATLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

2.76%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.21%

6.50%

+11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

9.77%

+14.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.42%

15.87%

+12.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.53%

14.91%

+14.62%

IDNA vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDNA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDNA vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

IDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
1.08%1.18%0.98%1.04%0.54%0.70%0.26%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDNA and TLT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDNA has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDNA dropped -68.26% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 5-year performance, TLT leads with -6.31% vs -8.26% for IDNA. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TLT has performed better with a -6.31% return vs -8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IDNA.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.08% for IDNA.

IDNA is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. IDNA tracks NYSE FactSet Global Genomics and Immuno Biopharma Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IDNA and 0.15% for TLT.

IDNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDNA and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer