PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDNA vs. PBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDNA vs. PBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) and Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDNA achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than PBE's -1.43% return.


IDNA

1D
-2.18%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
9.51%
6M
10.53%
1Y
41.74%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
-8.26%
10Y*

PBE

1D
-2.22%
1M
1.51%
YTD
-1.43%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
7.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDNA vs. PBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
9.51%17.26%-0.72%-7.63%-42.28%-3.98%54.30%20.83%
PBE
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF
-1.43%24.84%1.10%3.71%-10.83%1.54%25.66%9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IDNA and PBE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.85

The correlation between IDNA and PBE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDNA vs. PBE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDNA
PBE

Healthcare

97.8%
100.0%

Industrials

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IDNA
97.8%
PBE
100.0%

Industrials

IDNA
0.4%
PBE

-

Basic Materials

IDNA

-

PBE

-

Communication Services

IDNA

-

PBE

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDNA

-

PBE

-

Consumer Defensive

IDNA

-

PBE

-

Energy

IDNA

-

PBE

-

Financial Services

IDNA

-

PBE
0.0%

Real Estate

IDNA

-

PBE

-

Technology

IDNA

-

PBE

-

Utilities

IDNA

-

PBE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDNA vs. PBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDNA
IDNA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PBE
PBE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDNA vs. PBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) and Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDNAPBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.55

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

2.33

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

2.62

+1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.79

7.37

+4.42

IDNA vs. PBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the PBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDNA and PBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDNAPBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.55

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.13

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.32

-0.22

Drawdowns

IDNA vs. PBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDNA drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, which is greater than PBE's maximum drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDNA and PBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDNAPBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.26%

-45.69%

-22.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-11.73%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.73%

-22.43%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.26%

-34.71%

-33.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.01%

-5.55%

-40.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.24%

-16.24%

-20.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

4.17%

-0.47%

Volatility

IDNA vs. PBE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) at 5.33%. This indicates that IDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDNAPBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

5.33%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.21%

13.30%

+4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

18.67%

+5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.42%

22.52%

+5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.53%

24.91%

+4.62%

IDNA vs. PBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDNA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PBE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDNA vs. PBE - Dividend Comparison

IDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, which matches PBE's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
1.08%1.18%0.98%1.04%0.54%0.70%0.26%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBE
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF
1.07%1.00%0.05%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.38%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDNA and PBE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDNA has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to PBE (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDNA dropped -68.26% vs PBE's -45.69%.

On 5-year performance, PBE leads with 2.89% vs -8.26% for IDNA. On fees, IDNA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PBE has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PBE has performed better with a 2.89% return vs -8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDNA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PBE.

IDNA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.07% for PBE.

IDNA tracks NYSE FactSet Global Genomics and Immuno Biopharma Index, while PBE tracks Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IDNA and 0.59% for PBE.

IDNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDNA and PBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer