IDMO vs. SCHG
IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDMO returned 12.66%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for SCHG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDMO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
IDMO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.66%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
IDMO
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 26.66%
- 3Y*
- 25.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
SCHG
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
IDMO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 9.85% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 5.03% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDMO and SCHG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.51 |
The correlation between IDMO and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDMO vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDMO
SCHG
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
IDMO
SCHG
Industrials
IDMO
SCHG
Basic Materials
IDMO
SCHG
Utilities
IDMO
SCHG
Technology
IDMO
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
IDMO
SCHG
Communication Services
IDMO
SCHG
Real Estate
IDMO
SCHG
Energy
IDMO
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
IDMO
SCHG
Healthcare
IDMO
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDMO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
IDMO
SCHG
IDMO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDMO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.42 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 4.68 | +4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDMO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDMO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.38% | -34.59% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -16.41% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -23.39% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -34.59% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | -34.59% | +3.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -3.06% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -5.20% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 4.97% | -1.94% |
Volatility
IDMO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.59%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDMO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 5.59% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 12.52% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 16.09% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 22.35% | -4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 21.60% | -3.41% |
IDMO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IDMO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDMO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to SCHG (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.85% vs 12.66% for IDMO. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.04% for SCHG.
IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDMO and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer