PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 29.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has outperformed PIE with an annualized return of 12.61%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.


IDMO

1D
0.87%
1M
1.71%
6M
6.31%
YTD
11.63%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
12.61%
ALL TIME*
9.11%

PIE

1D
2.05%
1M
-6.22%
6M
19.42%
YTD
29.63%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
8.78%
ALL TIME*
2.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.90M$20.27M$22.82M
$1.91M$4.11M$2.85M

IDMO vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
11.63%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
29.63%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and PIE is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.48

The correlation between IDMO and PIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDMO vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
PIE

Financial Services

11.9%
14.6%

Basic Materials

4.7%
2.9%

Industrials

1.1%
15.3%

Energy

0.6%
3.7%

Technology

0.5%
52.7%

Healthcare

0.5%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
3.5%

Utilities

0.2%
1.2%

Communication Services

0.1%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
1.5%

Financial Services

IDMO
11.9%
PIE
14.6%

Basic Materials

IDMO
4.7%
PIE
2.9%

Industrials

IDMO
1.1%
PIE
15.3%

Energy

IDMO
0.6%
PIE
3.7%

Technology

IDMO
0.5%
PIE
52.7%

Healthcare

IDMO
0.5%
PIE
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
0.4%
PIE
0.2%

Real Estate

IDMO
0.3%
PIE
3.5%

Utilities

IDMO
0.2%
PIE
1.2%

Communication Services

IDMO
0.1%
PIE
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
0.0%
PIE
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDMO vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMOPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.68

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

10.63

-2.61

IDMO vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-72.98%

+33.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-17.26%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-28.69%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-37.02%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-40.32%

+8.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-11.32%

+10.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-25.90%

+16.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

4.34%

-1.12%

Volatility

IDMO vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) is 7.16%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that IDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

12.33%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

23.97%

-6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.24%

27.21%

-7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

21.35%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

21.87%

-3.90%

IDMO vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDMO vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than PIE's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.58%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.87%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and PIE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to IDMO (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.61% vs 8.78% for PIE. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.87% for PIE.

IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer