PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDLV vs. FDLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDLV vs. FDLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than FDLO's 5.38% return.


IDLV

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
4.87%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
5.05%

FDLO

1D
0.36%
1M
1.29%
YTD
5.38%
6M
4.87%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDLV vs. FDLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.63%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%20.09%-8.02%22.01%
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
5.38%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IDLV and FDLO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.68

The correlation between IDLV and FDLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDLV vs. FDLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDLV
FDLO

Financial Services

22.9%
12.5%

Industrials

16.4%
9.1%

Real Estate

15.4%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
4.7%

Utilities

11.4%
2.3%

Communication Services

8.6%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
10.2%

Energy

3.6%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.7%

Healthcare

1.7%
9.5%

Technology

0.7%
33.1%

Financial Services

IDLV
22.9%
FDLO
12.5%

Industrials

IDLV
16.4%
FDLO
9.1%

Real Estate

IDLV
15.4%
FDLO
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

IDLV
13.8%
FDLO
4.7%

Utilities

IDLV
11.4%
FDLO
2.3%

Communication Services

IDLV
8.6%
FDLO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IDLV
3.8%
FDLO
10.2%

Energy

IDLV
3.6%
FDLO
3.4%

Basic Materials

IDLV
2.3%
FDLO
1.7%

Healthcare

IDLV
1.7%
FDLO
9.5%

Technology

IDLV
0.7%
FDLO
33.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDLV vs. FDLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDLV vs. FDLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDLVFDLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.32

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.21

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

9.62

-5.96

IDLV vs. FDLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FDLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDLV and FDLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDLVFDLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.80

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.78

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.83

-0.38

Drawdowns

IDLV vs. FDLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FDLO drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and FDLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDLVFDLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-34.35%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-7.13%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-13.68%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-19.23%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-0.55%

-5.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-3.38%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.63%

+0.94%

Volatility

IDLV vs. FDLO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) at 1.91%. This indicates that IDLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDLVFDLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

1.91%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

6.42%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.76%

8.75%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

13.06%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.39%

15.50%

-2.11%

IDLV vs. FDLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDLV vs. FDLO - Dividend Comparison

IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than FDLO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.36%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%0.00%
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.69%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDLV and FDLO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDLV has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to FDLO (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs FDLO's -34.35%.

On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 10.20% vs 5.93% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.36% for FDLO.

IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index, while FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.29% for FDLO.

FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDLV and FDLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer