IDGT vs. GINN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDGT returned 10.52%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for GINN. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IDGT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

IDGT vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 35.87% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 9.33% return.

IDGT

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 0.79%
• 6M: 32.35%
• YTD: 35.87%
• 1Y: 40.38%
• 3Y*: 22.17%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 12.50%
• ALL TIME*: 4.93%

GINN

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: 7.30%
• YTD: 9.33%
• 1Y: 21.13%
• 3Y*: 18.35%
• 5Y*: 6.21%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	$141.87K	$128.01K	$214.74K
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	$4.41M	$4.29M	$8.06M

IDGT vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	35.87%	6.79%	26.71%	-6.09%	-17.90%	42.14%	15.77%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	9.33%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IDGT and GINN is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020	0.74

The correlation between IDGT and GINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDGT vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDGT	GINN
Technology	58.1%	33.0%
Real Estate	41.9%	0.6%
Communication Services	6.7%	9.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.7%
Energy	-	1.3%
Financial Services	-	12.5%
Healthcare	-	22.0%
Industrials	-	5.0%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

IDGT vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IDGT

IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 71
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 46
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IDGT vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDGT	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.28	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.82	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.22	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	1.61	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	5.47	+2.36

IDGT vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDGT and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDGT vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDGT	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.95%	-41.25%	-36.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.93%	-13.18%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.76%	-22.25%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.83%	-41.25%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.10%	-1.00%	-12.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.85%	-13.08%	-6.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	3.87%	+1.30%

Volatility

IDGT vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 4.15%. This indicates that IDGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDGT	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.90%	4.15%	+2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	13.00%	+5.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.41%	16.63%	+5.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.49%	21.45%	+2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.35%	20.95%	+2.40%

IDGT vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDGT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDGT vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than GINN's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.15%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	0.79%	1.17%	1.64%	0.37%	0.30%	0.28%	0.60%	0.42%	0.65%	0.57%	0.75%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDGT and GINN in my portfolio?

IDGT and GINN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDGT or GINN?

IDGT has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to GINN (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, IDGT or GINN?

On 5-year performance, IDGT leads with 10.52% vs 6.21% for GINN. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDGT or GINN?

Over the 5-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDGT or GINN?

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDGT or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.79% for IDGT.

What is the main difference between IDGT and GINN?

IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IDGT and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.