PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEV vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEV vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEV achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.72% return.


IDEV

1D
0.62%
1M
2.82%
YTD
9.92%
6M
13.26%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*

DBAW

1D
0.66%
1M
6.12%
YTD
16.72%
6M
19.43%
1Y
37.58%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEV vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
9.92%32.56%4.54%17.36%-14.99%13.00%8.32%23.12%-14.10%17.29%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.72%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEV and DBAW is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.88

The correlation between IDEV and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDEV vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDEV
DBAW

Financial Services

24.2%
24.1%

Industrials

19.1%
15.0%

Technology

9.9%
18.7%

Healthcare

8.6%
7.2%

Basic Materials

8.0%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
5.3%

Energy

5.9%
5.3%

Communication Services

4.0%
5.0%

Utilities

3.7%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.5%

Financial Services

IDEV
24.2%
DBAW
24.1%

Industrials

IDEV
19.1%
DBAW
15.0%

Technology

IDEV
9.9%
DBAW
18.7%

Healthcare

IDEV
8.6%
DBAW
7.2%

Basic Materials

IDEV
8.0%
DBAW
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IDEV
7.7%
DBAW
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

IDEV
6.0%
DBAW
5.3%

Energy

IDEV
5.9%
DBAW
5.3%

Communication Services

IDEV
4.0%
DBAW
5.0%

Utilities

IDEV
3.7%
DBAW
3.2%

Real Estate

IDEV
2.9%
DBAW
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEV vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEV vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDEVDBAWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

2.94

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

4.00

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.57

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

4.20

-1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.73

17.48

-8.75

IDEV vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEV and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDEVDBAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.94

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.85

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.63

-0.08

Drawdowns

IDEV vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and DBAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDEVDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.77%

-31.44%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-9.00%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-14.11%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-17.87%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-5.00%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.16%

+0.69%

Volatility

IDEV vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDEVDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.74%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

10.99%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

12.86%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

13.74%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

15.28%

+1.99%

IDEV vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEV vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than DBAW's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.28%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.10%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDEV and DBAW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBAW has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to IDEV (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 5-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.55% vs 8.88% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 3.10% for IDEV.

IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEV and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer