IDEQ vs. EFAS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS).

IDEQ and EFAS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IDEQ is an actively managed fund by Lazard. It was launched on May 12, 2025. EFAS is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2016.

Performance

IDEQ vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IDEQ vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF	4.61%	11.77%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	10.06%	5.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEQ achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 10.06% return.

IDEQ

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -9.10%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 12.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 39.97%
• 3Y*: 22.57%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEQ vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

EFAS

Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF

IDEQ

Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF

Return for Risk

IDEQ vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 96
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 97
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEQ vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDEQ	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.80	0.55	+1.25

Correlation

The correlation between IDEQ and EFAS is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IDEQ vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

IDEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than EFAS's 4.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF	0.58%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.54%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%

Drawdowns

IDEQ vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEQ and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDEQ	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-44.38%	+31.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.80%	-1.59%	-8.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-7.20%	+5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IDEQ	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.52%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.24%	14.22%	+3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.24%	15.68%	+1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.24%	18.45%	-1.21%