PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEQ vs. EMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEQ vs. EMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEQ achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly lower than EMKT's 31.94% return.


IDEQ

1D
0.85%
1M
4.87%
YTD
17.69%
6M
21.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMKT

1D
1.04%
1M
13.64%
YTD
31.94%
6M
33.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEQ vs. EMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDEQ and EMKT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEQ vs. EMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IDEQ vs. EMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDEQEMKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.40

2.52

-0.11

Drawdowns

IDEQ vs. EMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum EMKT drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEQ and EMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDEQEMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-14.21%

+1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-3.05%

+0.95%

Volatility

IDEQ vs. EMKT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDEQEMKTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.41%

22.44%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

22.44%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

22.44%

-4.03%

IDEQ vs. EMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EMKT's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEQ vs. EMKT - Dividend Comparison

IDEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while EMKT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDEQ and EMKT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDEQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDEQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EMKT.

IDEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for EMKT.

IDEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EMKT is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDEQ and 0.74% for EMKT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEQ and EMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer