IDEC vs. UGA
IDEC (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. IDEC is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, IDEC returned 13.46% vs 76.65% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. IDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
IDEC vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEC achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.24% return.
IDEC
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- 70.24%
- 6M
- 58.79%
- 1Y
- 76.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 24.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.20%
IDEC vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEC Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December | 4.16% | 21.78% | 2.50% | 2.78% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.24% | -2.00% | 3.77% | -1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEC and UGA is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2023 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IDEC and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEC vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
IDEC
UGA
IDEC vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDEC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 5.15 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 12.26 | -4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDEC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.19 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.12 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
IDEC vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEC drawdown since its inception was -8.51%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEC and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -86.59% | +78.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -14.98% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -14.98% | +13.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -36.75% | +35.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 6.27% | -4.59% |
Volatility
IDEC vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - December (IDEC) is 2.67%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that IDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 10.83% | -8.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 30.48% | -22.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.74% | 35.21% | -26.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 34.39% | -24.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 37.27% | -27.59% |
IDEC vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDEC vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
Neither IDEC nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEC and UGA have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to IDEC (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEC dropped -8.51% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 76.65% vs 13.46% for IDEC. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, IDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 76.65% return vs 13.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IDEC.
IDEC and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
IDEC is categorized as Options Trading, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IDEC and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEC and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer