PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOW vs. PTIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOW vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICOW having a 17.35% return and PTIN slightly lower at 16.79%.


ICOW

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.47%
YTD
17.35%
6M
18.06%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*

PTIN

1D
-0.77%
1M
6.96%
YTD
16.79%
6M
19.03%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOW vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
17.35%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%3.70%
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
16.79%16.17%3.36%16.04%-15.98%12.26%-0.56%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOW and PTIN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019

0.73

The correlation between ICOW and PTIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICOW vs. PTIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICOW
PTIN

Industrials

28.7%
17.6%

Energy

23.7%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
7.1%

Communication Services

8.9%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
5.7%

Healthcare

7.1%
8.7%

Technology

6.2%
15.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%
6.1%

Financial Services

-

26.5%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Industrials

ICOW
28.7%
PTIN
17.6%

Energy

ICOW
23.7%
PTIN
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ICOW
11.6%
PTIN
7.1%

Communication Services

ICOW
8.9%
PTIN
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

ICOW
8.5%
PTIN
5.7%

Healthcare

ICOW
7.1%
PTIN
8.7%

Technology

ICOW
6.2%
PTIN
15.8%

Basic Materials

ICOW
5.4%
PTIN
6.1%

Financial Services

ICOW

-

PTIN
26.5%

Real Estate

ICOW

-

PTIN
1.0%

Utilities

ICOW

-

PTIN
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOW vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PTIN
PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOW vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICOWPTINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.37

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

2.88

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

10.99

+6.55

ICOW vs. PTIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the PTIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOW and PTIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICOWPTINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

2.04

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.45

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.52

+0.03

Drawdowns

ICOW vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than PTIN's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and PTIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOWPTINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.49%

-21.27%

-22.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-11.55%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-13.93%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.48%

-21.27%

-7.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.77%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-7.68%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.02%

-0.78%

Volatility

ICOW vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) is 4.41%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that ICOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOWPTINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

5.75%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

13.85%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

16.27%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

14.39%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

13.90%

+4.57%

ICOW vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICOW vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison

ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than PTIN's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.12%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
2.17%2.53%2.67%2.09%0.41%2.38%0.77%0.97%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICOW and PTIN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIN has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs PTIN's -21.27%.

On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 6.48% for PTIN. On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 6.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.

ICOW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PTIN is Diversified Portfolio. ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.66% for PTIN.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOW and PTIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer