PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOW vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOW vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 16.40% return.


ICOW

1D
0.48%
1M
4.05%
6M
7.50%
YTD
14.28%
1Y
32.36%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.60%

IDOG

1D
0.05%
1M
5.40%
6M
10.61%
YTD
16.40%
1Y
34.66%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
10.94%
ALL TIME*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.61M$8.09M$8.95M
$1.71M$1.45M$1.24M

ICOW vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
14.28%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%17.91%-16.09%16.93%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
16.40%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOW and IDOG is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.85

The correlation between ICOW and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ICOW vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICOW
IDOG

Industrials

25.2%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
10.1%

Communication Services

12.7%
9.5%

Energy

11.9%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
10.3%

Basic Materials

9.9%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.3%
10.4%

Technology

7.7%
7.7%

Financial Services

-

10.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

10.2%

Industrials

ICOW
25.2%
IDOG
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ICOW
14.4%
IDOG
10.1%

Communication Services

ICOW
12.7%
IDOG
9.5%

Energy

ICOW
11.9%
IDOG
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

ICOW
10.1%
IDOG
10.3%

Basic Materials

ICOW
9.9%
IDOG
9.8%

Healthcare

ICOW
8.3%
IDOG
10.4%

Technology

ICOW
7.7%
IDOG
7.7%

Financial Services

ICOW

-

IDOG
10.6%

Real Estate

ICOW

-

IDOG

-

Utilities

ICOW

-

IDOG
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOW vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ICOW vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICOWIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

5.38

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

16.68

-6.57

ICOW vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOW and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICOW vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOWIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.49%

-37.32%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-6.47%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-13.92%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

-25.31%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-0.27%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-7.86%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.08%

+1.13%

Volatility

ICOW vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 2.79%. This indicates that ICOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOWIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

2.79%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

10.78%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

13.36%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

15.64%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

17.09%

+1.35%

ICOW vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICOW vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than IDOG's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.23%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%0.00%0.00%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.23%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICOW and IDOG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOW has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to IDOG (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, IDOG leads with 14.23% vs 10.22% for ICOW. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.23% for ICOW.

ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOW and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer