ICOW vs. FLRT
ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer. ICOW is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICOW returned 10.22%/yr vs 6.08%/yr for FLRT. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ICOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
ICOW vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 2.44% return.
ICOW
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 32.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.60%
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.79M | $4.57M | $4.68M | |
| $9.61M | $8.09M | $8.95M |
ICOW vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.28% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.93% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.44% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 9.44% | -1.14% | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOW and FLRT is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICOW vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
ICOW
FLRT
ICOW vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICOW | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.76 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 2.90 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 10.63 | -0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICOW vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOW | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -20.96% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -1.78% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -2.87% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.79% | -7.60% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | 0.00% | -3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -1.39% | -6.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 0.48% | +2.73% |
Volatility
ICOW vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) at 0.29%. This indicates that ICOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICOW | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 0.29% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 1.19% | +10.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 1.49% | +13.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 2.30% | +14.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 6.09% | +12.35% |
ICOW vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICOW vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than FLRT's 6.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.71% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.23% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICOW and FLRT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to FLRT (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs FLRT's -20.96%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.22% vs 6.08% for FLRT. On fees, FLRT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLRT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.71%, compared with 2.23% for ICOW.
ICOW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLRT is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICOW and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer