ICOW vs. FID
ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICOW returned 10.06%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
ICOW vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 17.35% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -12.66% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOW and FID is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between ICOW and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
ICOW vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICOW
FID
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ICOW
FID
Energy
ICOW
FID
Consumer Cyclical
ICOW
FID
Communication Services
ICOW
FID
Consumer Defensive
ICOW
FID
Healthcare
ICOW
FID
Technology
ICOW
FID
Basic Materials
ICOW
FID
Financial Services
ICOW
-
FID
Real Estate
ICOW
-
FID
Utilities
ICOW
-
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICOW vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
ICOW
FID
ICOW vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICOW | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.41 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 2.62 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 9.14 | +8.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICOW | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.30 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.46 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.39 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
ICOW vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than FID's maximum drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOW | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -39.79% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -8.93% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -10.97% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.48% | -29.13% | +0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -1.11% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -8.47% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.55% | -0.31% |
Volatility
ICOW vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that ICOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICOW | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 3.00% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 8.12% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 10.16% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 17.04% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 18.96% | -0.49% |
ICOW vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICOW vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.12% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICOW and FID have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, FID is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FID is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.
ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.60% for FID.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICOW and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer