PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICOW vs. ECOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICOW vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 17.35% return, which is significantly higher than ECOW's 13.10% return.


ICOW

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.47%
YTD
17.35%
6M
18.06%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*

ECOW

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
13.10%
6M
12.29%
1Y
35.35%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICOW vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
17.35%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%4.72%
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.10%32.50%3.17%15.79%-19.28%7.47%-2.51%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ICOW and ECOW is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.63

The correlation between ICOW and ECOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

ICOW vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ICOW
ECOW

Industrials

28.7%
15.5%

Energy

23.7%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
12.5%

Communication Services

8.9%
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
8.5%

Healthcare

7.1%
1.6%

Technology

6.2%
9.8%

Basic Materials

5.4%
9.6%

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

7.9%

Industrials

ICOW
28.7%
ECOW
15.5%

Energy

ICOW
23.7%
ECOW
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ICOW
11.6%
ECOW
12.5%

Communication Services

ICOW
8.9%
ECOW
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

ICOW
8.5%
ECOW
8.5%

Healthcare

ICOW
7.1%
ECOW
1.6%

Technology

ICOW
6.2%
ECOW
9.8%

Basic Materials

ICOW
5.4%
ECOW
9.6%

Financial Services

ICOW

-

ECOW

-

Real Estate

ICOW

-

ECOW

-

Utilities

ICOW

-

ECOW
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICOW vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ECOW
ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICOW vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICOWECOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

4.25

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

15.39

+2.15

ICOW vs. ECOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the ECOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICOW and ECOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICOWECOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

2.50

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.35

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.37

+0.17

Drawdowns

ICOW vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than ECOW's maximum drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and ECOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICOWECOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.49%

-40.27%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-8.35%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-18.77%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.48%

-33.67%

+5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-3.53%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-11.07%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.30%

-0.06%

Volatility

ICOW vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) is 4.41%, while Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that ICOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICOWECOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.66%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

10.88%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

14.19%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

17.65%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

20.13%

-1.66%

ICOW vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICOW vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than ECOW's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
4.60%5.20%7.35%5.46%7.50%4.39%3.35%8.08%0.00%0.00%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.12%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICOW and ECOW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECOW has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs ECOW's -40.27%.

On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 6.12% for ECOW. On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.

ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.

ICOW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ECOW is Emerging Markets Equities. ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.70% for ECOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICOW and ECOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer