ECOW vs. MOTI
ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) and MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECOW is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while MOTI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOW returned 5.74%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for MOTI. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECOW charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for MOTI.
Performance
ECOW vs. MOTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOW achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than MOTI's -9.93% return.
ECOW
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 30.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- —
MOTI
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -9.93%
- 6M
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- 0.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
ECOW vs. MOTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.95% | 32.50% | 3.17% | 15.79% | -19.28% | 7.47% | -2.51% | 10.37% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | -9.93% | 25.01% | 1.94% | 10.18% | -6.93% | 0.03% | 7.24% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOW and MOTI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between ECOW and MOTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ECOW vs. MOTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECOW
MOTI
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Communication Services
ECOW
MOTI
Industrials
ECOW
MOTI
Consumer Cyclical
ECOW
MOTI
Technology
ECOW
MOTI
Energy
ECOW
MOTI
-
Consumer Defensive
ECOW
MOTI
Basic Materials
ECOW
MOTI
Utilities
ECOW
MOTI
-
Healthcare
ECOW
MOTI
Financial Services
ECOW
-
MOTI
Real Estate
ECOW
-
MOTI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOW vs. MOTI — Risk / Return Rank
ECOW
MOTI
ECOW vs. MOTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECOW | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.02 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 0.05 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.56 | 0.13 | +11.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECOW vs. MOTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOW drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than MOTI's maximum drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOW and MOTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOW | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -36.70% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -15.45% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -16.35% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -28.77% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -15.20% | +8.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -9.15% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 6.44% | -3.78% |
Volatility
ECOW vs. MOTI - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) at 3.06%. This indicates that ECOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOW | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 3.06% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 11.09% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 14.40% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 17.54% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 17.82% | +2.31% |
ECOW vs. MOTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOW has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MOTI's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOW vs. MOTI - Dividend Comparison
ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than MOTI's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.61% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 3.58% | 3.22% | 4.79% | 2.34% | 3.27% | 4.67% | 2.14% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 8.87% | 1.33% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOW and MOTI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECOW has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to MOTI (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECOW dropped -40.27% vs MOTI's -36.70%.
On 5-year performance, ECOW leads with 5.74% vs 1.74% for MOTI. On fees, MOTI is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ECOW has performed better with a 5.74% return vs 1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOTI is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.
ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 3.58% for MOTI.
ECOW is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while MOTI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ECOW and 0.57% for MOTI.
ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECOW and MOTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer