ICOW vs. BKIE
ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index while BKIE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICOW returned 10.22%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for BKIE. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ICOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
ICOW vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICOW achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 12.14% return.
ICOW
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 32.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.60%
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- YTD
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.46M | $7.01M | $6.05M | |
| $9.61M | $8.09M | $8.95M |
ICOW vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.28% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 46.17% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 12.14% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOW and BKIE is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ICOW and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
ICOW vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ICOW
BKIE
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ICOW
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
ICOW
BKIE
Communication Services
ICOW
BKIE
Energy
ICOW
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
ICOW
BKIE
Basic Materials
ICOW
BKIE
Healthcare
ICOW
BKIE
Technology
ICOW
BKIE
Financial Services
ICOW
-
BKIE
Real Estate
ICOW
-
BKIE
Utilities
ICOW
-
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICOW vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
ICOW
BKIE
ICOW vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICOW | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.31 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 2.34 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 9.09 | +1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICOW vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOW drawdown since its inception was -43.49%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOW and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOW | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -28.19% | -15.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -11.41% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -13.19% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.79% | -28.19% | +0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -0.32% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -4.88% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 2.93% | +0.28% |
Volatility
ICOW vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) is 3.29%, while BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that ICOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICOW | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 4.12% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 12.98% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 15.24% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 16.22% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 16.32% | +2.12% |
ICOW vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICOW vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than BKIE's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.14% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.23% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICOW and BKIE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKIE has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to ICOW (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICOW dropped -43.49% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.22% vs 9.84% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 2.23% for ICOW.
ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index, while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ICOW and 0.04% for BKIE.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICOW and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer