ICOP vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
ICOP and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICOP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 21, 2023. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. Both ICOP and NLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ICOP vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICOP vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOP Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF | 7.37% | 78.01% | 1.10% | 8.08% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 7.24% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 29.14% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ICOP having a 7.37% return and NLR slightly lower at 7.24%.
ICOP
- 1D
- 7.18%
- 1M
- -16.75%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 88.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -10.17%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 86.31%
- 3Y*
- 37.32%
- 5Y*
- 23.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICOP vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICOP has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICOP vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
ICOP
NLR
ICOP vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICOP | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 2.06 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 2.63 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.26 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 7.88 | +5.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICOP | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.06 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.18 | +0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICOP and NLR is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ICOP vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than NLR's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOP Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF | 1.94% | 2.08% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.38% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
ICOP vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICOP drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICOP and NLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICOP | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.67% | -65.05% | +26.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.13% | -25.80% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.97% | -18.97% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -35.91% | +24.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 10.67% | -4.39% |
Volatility
ICOP vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Copper And Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a higher volatility of 17.29% compared to VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) at 14.04%. This indicates that ICOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICOP | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.29% | 14.04% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.15% | 32.94% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.44% | 42.23% | -3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.10% | 28.16% | +4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.10% | 23.39% | +9.71% |