ICHKX vs. CHILX
ICHKX (Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund) and CHILX (BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ICHKX returned -4.27%/yr vs -0.01%/yr for CHILX. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ICHKX charges 1.71%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHILX.
Performance
ICHKX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICHKX achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than CHILX's 5.98% return.
ICHKX
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 10.14%
- 6M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.04%
- 5Y*
- -4.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.97%
CHILX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ICHKX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | -0.49% | 28.97% | 0.05% | -14.52% | -23.67% | -6.90% | 14.58% | 33.10% |
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 5.98% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICHKX and CHILX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ICHKX and CHILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICHKX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank
ICHKX
CHILX
ICHKX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICHKX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 1.81 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 5.84 | -4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICHKX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICHKX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHKX and CHILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICHKX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -47.73% | -22.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.33% | -11.64% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.21% | -22.21% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.88% | -43.88% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.68% | -11.34% | -25.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.27% | -20.18% | -7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.31% | 3.61% | +2.70% |
Volatility
ICHKX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) is 5.60%, while BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that ICHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICHKX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 10.16% | -4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.88% | 17.04% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.22% | 20.70% | -3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 20.76% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 22.11% | +0.34% |
ICHKX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICHKX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICHKX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison
ICHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than CHILX's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.77% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | 1.06% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.86% | 20.44% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 12.53% | 6.76% | 5.31% | 12.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICHKX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHILX has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to ICHKX (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICHKX dropped -70.67% vs CHILX's -47.73%.
CHILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICHKX and CHILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer