PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICHKX vs. CHILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICHKX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICHKX achieves a -6.77% return, which is significantly lower than CHILX's 14.73% return.


ICHKX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-6.94%
YTD
-6.77%
6M
-7.39%
1Y
10.53%
3Y*
1.48%
5Y*
-6.72%
10Y*
3.64%

CHILX

1D
1.39%
1M
2.76%
YTD
14.73%
6M
15.97%
1Y
42.70%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICHKX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ICHKX
Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund
-6.77%28.97%0.05%-14.52%-23.67%-6.90%14.58%33.10%
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
14.73%26.30%15.44%-12.29%-28.54%3.54%48.69%48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ICHKX and CHILX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.76

The correlation between ICHKX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICHKX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICHKX
ICHKX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ICHKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICHKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICHKX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ICHKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICHKX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CHILX
CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICHKX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ICHKXCHILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.42

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

4.97

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

15.19

-12.96

ICHKX vs. CHILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICHKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the CHILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICHKX and CHILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ICHKX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICHKX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHKX and CHILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICHKXCHILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.67%

-47.73%

-22.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-8.54%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.10%

-22.59%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.29%

-43.88%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.67%

-4.02%

-36.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.22%

-20.37%

-6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

2.79%

+1.61%

Volatility

ICHKX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) is 4.93%, while BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that ICHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICHKXCHILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

7.27%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

13.15%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

17.44%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.70%

20.36%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

21.87%

+0.56%

ICHKX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICHKX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ICHKX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison

ICHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than CHILX's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
2.56%2.94%2.11%2.02%0.92%1.19%3.64%12.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICHKX
Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund
1.13%1.06%1.11%0.74%0.86%20.44%3.57%4.37%12.53%6.76%5.31%12.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICHKX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHILX has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to ICHKX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICHKX dropped -70.67% vs CHILX's -47.73%.

CHILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICHKX and CHILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer