PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ICHKX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ICHKX and VOO is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

ICHKX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-59.26%
602.93%
ICHKX
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ICHKX:

0.15

VOO:

2.25

Sortino Ratio

ICHKX:

0.43

VOO:

2.98

Omega Ratio

ICHKX:

1.05

VOO:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

ICHKX:

0.05

VOO:

3.31

Martin Ratio

ICHKX:

0.35

VOO:

14.77

Ulcer Index

ICHKX:

11.47%

VOO:

1.90%

Daily Std Dev

ICHKX:

26.88%

VOO:

12.46%

Max Drawdown

ICHKX:

-75.49%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

ICHKX:

-71.06%

VOO:

-2.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICHKX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ICHKX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -7.11%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.


ICHKX

YTD

-0.39%

1M

-1.91%

6M

6.57%

1Y

2.15%

5Y*

-10.63%

10Y*

-7.11%

VOO

YTD

26.02%

1M

-0.11%

6M

9.35%

1Y

26.45%

5Y*

14.79%

10Y*

13.08%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICHKX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICHKX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


ICHKX
Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund
Expense ratio chart for ICHKX: current value at 1.71% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.71%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ICHKX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ICHKX, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.152.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for ICHKX, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.432.98
The chart of Omega ratio for ICHKX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.051.42
The chart of Calmar ratio for ICHKX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.000.063.31
The chart of Martin ratio for ICHKX, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.000.3514.77
ICHKX
VOO

The current ICHKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICHKX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.15
2.25
ICHKX
VOO

Dividends

ICHKX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ICHKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ICHKX
Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund
0.00%0.74%0.33%0.37%0.77%1.84%1.65%0.61%1.42%2.32%1.90%1.39%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.91%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

ICHKX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICHKX drawdown since its inception was -75.49%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHKX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-66.30%
-2.47%
ICHKX
VOO

Volatility

ICHKX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.75%. This indicates that ICHKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.29%
3.75%
ICHKX
VOO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab