ICHKX vs. GAAEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX).
ICHKX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 1994. GAAEX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Mar 30, 2006.
Performance
ICHKX vs. GAAEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICHKX vs. GAAEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | -3.57% | 28.97% | 0.05% | -14.52% | -23.67% | -6.90% | 14.58% | 30.08% | -20.50% | 49.07% |
GAAEX Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund | -3.94% | 26.64% | -11.85% | -2.39% | -12.67% | 8.40% | 86.45% | 30.20% | -15.49% | 20.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICHKX achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly higher than GAAEX's -3.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ICHKX has underperformed GAAEX with an annualized return of 3.91%, while GAAEX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.24% annualized return.
ICHKX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -4.32%
- 1Y
- 12.70%
- 3Y*
- 1.13%
- 5Y*
- -6.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
GAAEX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -12.61%
- YTD
- -3.94%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- -1.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICHKX vs. GAAEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICHKX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GAAEX's 1.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICHKX vs. GAAEX — Risk / Return Rank
ICHKX
GAAEX
ICHKX vs. GAAEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICHKX | GAAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 1.23 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.84 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.69 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 6.26 | -2.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICHKX | GAAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 1.23 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | -0.02 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.37 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.10 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICHKX and GAAEX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ICHKX vs. GAAEX - Dividend Comparison
ICHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than GAAEX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | 1.10% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.86% | 20.44% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 12.53% | 6.76% | 5.31% | 12.25% |
GAAEX Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund | 0.34% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICHKX vs. GAAEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICHKX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, smaller than the maximum GAAEX drawdown of -85.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHKX and GAAEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICHKX | GAAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -85.83% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | -14.57% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.67% | -40.64% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.39% | -40.64% | -17.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.64% | -59.02% | +20.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -63.74% | +36.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 3.94% | -0.62% |
Volatility
ICHKX vs. GAAEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) is 5.42%, while Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that ICHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAAEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICHKX | GAAEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 6.70% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 13.83% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 21.99% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 22.23% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 22.23% | +0.17% |