ICHKX vs. FCHKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX).
ICHKX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 1994. FCHKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
ICHKX vs. FCHKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICHKX vs. FCHKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | -3.57% | 28.97% | 0.05% | -14.52% | -23.67% | -6.90% | 14.58% | 30.08% | -20.50% | 49.07% |
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C | 5.23% | 41.13% | 21.90% | -1.27% | -24.66% | -14.60% | 46.29% | 33.74% | -18.29% | 50.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICHKX achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than FCHKX's 5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ICHKX has underperformed FCHKX with an annualized return of 3.91%, while FCHKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.
ICHKX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -4.32%
- 1Y
- 12.70%
- 3Y*
- 1.13%
- 5Y*
- -6.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
FCHKX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 42.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICHKX vs. FCHKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICHKX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FCHKX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICHKX vs. FCHKX — Risk / Return Rank
ICHKX
FCHKX
ICHKX vs. FCHKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICHKX | FCHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 1.81 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 2.34 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.34 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 2.42 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 9.31 | -5.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICHKX | FCHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 1.81 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.07 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.50 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.18 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICHKX and FCHKX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICHKX vs. FCHKX - Dividend Comparison
ICHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than FCHKX's 0.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | 1.10% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.86% | 20.44% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 12.53% | 6.76% | 5.31% | 12.25% |
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C | 0.83% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 11.31% | 4.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICHKX vs. FCHKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICHKX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than FCHKX's maximum drawdown of -59.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICHKX and FCHKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICHKX | FCHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -59.14% | -11.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | -15.97% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.67% | -54.57% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.39% | -59.14% | +0.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.64% | -10.88% | -27.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -21.52% | -5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 4.15% | -0.83% |
Volatility
ICHKX vs. FCHKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) is 5.42%, while Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that ICHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCHKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICHKX | FCHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 9.28% | -3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 16.44% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 23.15% | -4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 23.96% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 22.09% | +0.31% |