PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ICF vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ICF vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICF returned 5.54%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for UGA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

ICF vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 5.54%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.

ICF

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
12.19%
6M
11.56%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
5.54%

UGA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-12.35%
YTD
75.49%
6M
64.35%
1Y
80.94%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
25.10%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICF vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF		12.19%1.85%5.30%10.36%-26.12%44.17%-5.43%25.48%-2.55%4.90%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP		75.49%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ICF and UGA is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2008

0.13

The correlation between ICF and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF

United States Gasoline Fund LP

Often compared with ICF:
ICF vs. VNQICF vs. USRTICF vs. IYRICF vs. FRELICF vs. ICFIICF vs. SDIVICF vs. XLRE
Often compared with UGA:
UGA vs. URAUGA vs. FCGUGA vs. QQQUGA vs. VOOUGA vs. USOUGA vs. SPYUGA vs. FNGS

Return for Risk

ICF vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ICF
ICF Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICF vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ICFUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.84
2.32

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.20
2.75

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.37

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

5.47

-4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

13.25

-9.33

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICF vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICF and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ICFUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.32

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.73

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.39

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.12

+0.19

Drawdowns

ICF vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and UGA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ICFUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-86.59%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-14.88%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-26.68%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-38.11%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-75.89%

+35.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-12.35%

+9.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-36.76%

+22.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

6.13%

-3.25%

Volatility

ICF vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 3.71%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ICFUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

11.66%

-7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

30.41%

-20.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

35.14%

-21.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

34.38%

-15.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

37.27%

-16.69%

ICF vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICF vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF		2.48%2.88%2.66%2.76%2.64%1.82%2.38%2.55%3.20%3.10%4.21%3.30%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ICF and UGA have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to ICF (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.43% vs 5.54% for ICF. On fees, ICF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

ICF is categorized as REIT, while UGA is Oil & Gas. ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICF and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer