ICF vs. SPSM
ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and SPSM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SPSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICF returned 5.99%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for SPSM. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPSM.
Performance
ICF vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed SPSM with an annualized return of 5.99%, while SPSM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.
ICF
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
SPSM
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 37.11%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
ICF vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 16.93% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 19.73% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 26.67% | 11.69% | 25.85% | -11.17% | 15.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and SPSM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between ICF and SPSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
SPSM
ICF vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICF | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.96 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 13.39 | -8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICF vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than SPSM's maximum drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and SPSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -42.89% | -33.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -8.72% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -27.94% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -27.94% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | -42.89% | +2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -7.91% | -6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.59% | +0.30% |
Volatility
ICF vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 4.74%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 5.14% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 11.96% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 17.69% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 21.45% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 23.00% | -2.40% |
ICF vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICF vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than SPSM's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.38% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.37% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICF and SPSM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPSM has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to ICF (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs SPSM's -42.89%.
On 10-year performance, SPSM leads with 11.30% vs 5.99% for ICF. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPSM has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.37% for SPSM.
ICF is categorized as REIT, while SPSM is Small Cap Blend Equities. ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.03% for SPSM.
SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICF and SPSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer