ICF vs. MTUM
ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICF returned 5.99%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for MTUM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
ICF vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 5.99%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.15% annualized return.
ICF
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 42.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
ICF vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 16.93% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | -5.43% | 25.48% | -2.55% | 4.90% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 29.72% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and MTUM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ICF and MTUM has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
MTUM
ICF vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICF | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.55 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 13.66 | -8.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICF vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -34.08% | -42.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -11.54% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -20.99% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -32.28% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | -34.08% | -6.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.55% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -6.20% | -7.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.99% | -0.10% |
Volatility
ICF vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 4.74%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 10.89% | -6.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 18.63% | -8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 20.87% | -6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 20.94% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 21.20% | -0.60% |
ICF vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICF vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than MTUM's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.38% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICF and MTUM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to ICF (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.15% vs 5.99% for ICF. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ICF.
ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.
ICF is categorized as REIT, while MTUM is Momentum. ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICF and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer