PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ICF vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ICF vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ICF (iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ICF is a REIT fund tracking the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ICF returned 5.54%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for BNO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ICF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

ICF vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ICF has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 5.54%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.13% annualized return.

ICF

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
12.19%
6M
11.56%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
5.54%

BNO

1D
-2.71%
1M
-9.80%
YTD
85.31%
6M
79.66%
1Y
88.71%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
23.48%
10Y*
13.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICF vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF		12.19%1.85%5.30%10.36%-26.12%44.17%-5.43%25.48%-2.55%4.90%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		85.31%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ICF and BNO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.10

The correlation between ICF and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with ICF:
ICF vs. VNQICF vs. USRTICF vs. IYRICF vs. FRELICF vs. ICFIICF vs. SDIVICF vs. XLRE
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

ICF vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ICF
ICF Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ICF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICF Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ICF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICF Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICF vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ICFBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.84
2.15

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.20
2.65

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

4.99

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

9.39

-5.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ICF vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICF and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ICFBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.15

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.67

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.36

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.14

+0.18

Drawdowns

ICF vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ICFBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-87.06%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-17.87%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-23.75%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-33.70%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-75.18%

+34.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-12.72%

+10.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-40.16%

+25.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

9.48%

-6.60%

Volatility

ICF vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) is 3.71%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that ICF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ICFBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

14.12%

-10.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

36.21%

-26.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

41.56%

-27.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

35.40%

-16.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

36.69%

-16.11%

ICF vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICF vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICF
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF		2.48%2.88%2.66%2.76%2.64%1.82%2.38%2.55%3.20%3.10%4.21%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

ICF and BNO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to ICF (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICF dropped -76.74% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.13% vs 5.54% for ICF. On fees, ICF is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ICF has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICF is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

ICF has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

ICF is categorized as REIT, while BNO is Oil & Gas. ICF tracks Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ICF and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICF and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer