ICF vs. BLDG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG).
ICF and BLDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. BLDG is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020.
Performance
ICF vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICF vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 4.03% | 1.85% | 5.30% | 10.36% | -26.12% | 44.17% | 10.11% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | -0.94% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICF achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's -0.94% return.
ICF
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
BLDG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -8.62%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- -3.58%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICF vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICF vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
ICF
BLDG
ICF vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICF | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 0.46 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.39 | 0.71 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.09 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.55 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 2.04 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICF | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.46 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.15 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.38 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICF and BLDG is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICF vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
ICF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than BLDG's 6.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICF iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | 2.67% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 1.82% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 3.20% | 3.10% | 4.21% | 3.30% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 6.12% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICF vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICF drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICF and BLDG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICF | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -27.25% | -49.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -10.80% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -27.25% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -8.96% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -9.44% | -4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.93% | +0.31% |
Volatility
ICF vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF (ICF) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 4.20%. This indicates that ICF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICF | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.20% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 7.38% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 13.30% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 15.24% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 15.61% | +4.98% |