ICBMX vs. FLIAX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ICBMX (ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund) and FLIAX (First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ICBMX returned 15.28%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for FLIAX. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ICBMX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FLIAX.

Performance

ICBMX vs. FLIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICBMX achieves a 20.46% return, which is significantly higher than FLIAX's 17.06% return.

ICBMX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 2.54%
• 6M: 9.12%
• YTD: 20.46%
• 1Y: 39.51%
• 3Y*: 18.65%
• 5Y*: 15.28%
• 10Y*: 13.01%
• ALL TIME*: 7.00%

FLIAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 14.38%
• YTD: 17.06%
• 1Y: 8.36%
• 3Y*: 10.59%
• 5Y*: 6.55%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLIAX First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ICBMX vs. FLIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund	20.46%	15.95%	21.25%	11.02%	0.50%	19.43%
FLIAX First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund	17.06%	-0.20%	12.21%	0.59%	-5.85%	24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ICBMX and FLIAX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2021	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between ICBMX and FLIAX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ICBMX vs. FLIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ICBMX

ICBMX Risk / Return Rank: 80
ICBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ICBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ICBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ICBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ICBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FLIAX

FLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 15
FLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ICBMX vs. FLIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICBMX	FLIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	0.59	+1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	0.83	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.13	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	0.76	+2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.44	2.49	+9.96

ICBMX vs. FLIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the FLIAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICBMX and FLIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICBMX vs. FLIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICBMX drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, which is greater than FLIAX's maximum drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBMX and FLIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICBMX	FLIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.92%	-23.23%	-40.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.10%	-12.50%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.49%	-12.50%	-13.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.49%	-23.23%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-3.19%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-6.31%	-11.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	3.60%	-0.70%

Volatility

ICBMX vs. FLIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) is 3.51%, while First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that ICBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICBMX	FLIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	4.19%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.95%	10.32%	+2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.77%	15.99%	+3.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.60%	16.13%	+4.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.23%	15.77%	+6.46%

ICBMX vs. FLIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIAX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICBMX vs. FLIAX - Dividend Comparison

ICBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%, while FLIAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLIAX First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.21%	2.90%	19.90%	5.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund	8.31%	10.01%	17.24%	7.07%	11.07%	1.32%	0.32%	1.55%	21.58%	1.19%	0.53%	7.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICBMX and FLIAX in my portfolio?

ICBMX and FLIAX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ICBMX or FLIAX?

FLIAX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to ICBMX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICBMX dropped -63.92% vs FLIAX's -23.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.