PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLIAX vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLIAX vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLIAX having a 17.87% return and PAVE slightly lower at 17.59%.


FLIAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.20%
6M
13.82%
YTD
17.87%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.31%

PAVE

1D
2.02%
1M
-4.79%
6M
9.76%
YTD
17.59%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$105.51M$125.57M$111.31M

FLIAX vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLIAX
First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund
17.87%-0.20%12.21%0.59%-5.85%24.12%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
17.59%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%28.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIAX and PAVE is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2021

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between FLIAX and PAVE has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLIAX vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLIAX
FLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLIAX vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLIAXPAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

1.92

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

6.36

-3.67

FLIAX vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIAX and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLIAX vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIAX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIAX and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLIAXPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.23%

-44.08%

+20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-11.91%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.50%

-26.23%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.23%

-26.23%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-6.32%

+3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-6.19%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.60%

-0.01%

Volatility

FLIAX vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) is 4.30%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that FLIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLIAXPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

6.38%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

16.61%

-6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

20.43%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

21.71%

-5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

24.37%

-8.59%

FLIAX vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLIAX vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

FLIAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLIAX
First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund
0.00%0.00%6.21%2.90%19.90%5.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.77%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLIAX and PAVE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAVE has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to FLIAX (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIAX dropped -23.23% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLIAX and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer