PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLIAX vs. BGLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLIAX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIAX achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than BGLYX's 8.61% return.


FLIAX

1D
1.36%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
13.60%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*

BGLYX

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIAX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLIAX
First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund
13.60%-0.20%12.21%0.59%-5.85%24.12%
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.61%13.04%9.01%3.32%-5.47%15.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIAX and BGLYX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2021

0.87

The correlation between FLIAX and BGLYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLIAX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIAX
FLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLYX
BGLYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BGLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIAX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLIAXBGLYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

2.19

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

7.21

-4.72

FLIAX vs. BGLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the BGLYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIAX and BGLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLIAXBGLYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.31

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.51

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.48

+0.03

Drawdowns

FLIAX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIAX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum BGLYX drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIAX and BGLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLIAXBGLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.23%

-36.54%

+13.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-6.32%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-14.56%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.23%

-20.94%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-4.48%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-7.85%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

1.92%

+1.62%

Volatility

FLIAX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison

First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) at 3.58%. This indicates that FLIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLIAXBGLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.58%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

8.55%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

10.54%

+4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

13.60%

+2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.82%

15.64%

+0.18%

FLIAX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLIAX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison

FLIAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
28.53%30.30%1.89%1.88%7.34%4.53%3.71%3.94%4.31%4.03%4.09%4.03%
FLIAX
First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund
0.00%0.00%6.21%2.90%19.90%5.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLIAX and BGLYX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLIAX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to BGLYX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIAX dropped -23.23% vs BGLYX's -36.54%.

BGLYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLIAX and BGLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer