ICBMX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
ICBMX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on May 4, 1997. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
ICBMX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICBMX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 15.65% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 16.93% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 9.43% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICBMX achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 9.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ICBMX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 13.20%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
ICBMX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICBMX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICBMX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
ICBMX
CSUIX
ICBMX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICBMX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 1.71 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 2.27 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.50 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 10.88 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICBMX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.71 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.65 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.53 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.58 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICBMX and CSUIX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ICBMX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
ICBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, more than CSUIX's 7.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.65% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.69% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
ICBMX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICBMX drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, which is greater than CSUIX's maximum drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBMX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICBMX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.92% | -52.01% | -11.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -7.99% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.49% | -20.01% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.18% | -35.01% | -13.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -3.49% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -8.21% | -9.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 1.84% | +1.87% |
Volatility
ICBMX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.43%. This indicates that ICBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICBMX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 3.43% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 6.90% | +9.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.07% | 11.49% | +13.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 12.87% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 14.88% | +7.41% |