CSUIX vs. GLIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX).
CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004. GLIFX is managed by Lazard.
Performance
CSUIX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUIX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 5.89% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUIX achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUIX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
GLIFX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUIX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUIX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUIX
GLIFX
CSUIX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUIX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 2.23 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.83 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.74 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | 11.44 | -0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUIX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.23 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 1.14 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.75 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.85 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUIX and GLIFX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUIX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison
CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than GLIFX's 6.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.37% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
Drawdowns
CSUIX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and GLIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUIX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -29.65% | -22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -9.00% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -17.15% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | -29.65% | -5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -7.05% | +2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -3.35% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.16% | -0.34% |
Volatility
CSUIX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) is 3.24%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that CSUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUIX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 4.58% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | 7.35% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 10.71% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 10.70% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 13.25% | +1.63% |