IBUY vs. TMH
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - IBUY tracks the EQM Online Retail Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
IBUY vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBUY
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -10.92%
- 6M
- -10.14%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBUY vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -1.69% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and TMH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
TMH
IBUY vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBUY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBUY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | -5.39 | +5.74 |
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -5.59% | -67.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -5.59% | -46.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -4.22% | -25.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.50% | — | — |
Volatility
IBUY vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 20.85% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.07% | 20.85% | +11.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 20.85% | +8.31% |
IBUY vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and TMH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
IBUY has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer