IBUY vs. TMH
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - IBUY tracks the EQM Online Retail Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
IBUY vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBUY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
TMH
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBUY vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 1.24% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and TMH is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBUY vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBUY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -10.20% | -62.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.33% | -10.20% | -41.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -5.78% | -23.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | — | — |
Volatility
IBUY vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 25.94% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.13% | 25.94% | +6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.18% | 25.94% | +3.24% |
IBUY vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than TMH's 5.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and TMH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer