IBTJ vs. LIF
IBTJ (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index, while LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, IBTJ returned 3.40% vs -25.93% for LIF. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBTJ vs. LIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than LIF's -29.45% return.
IBTJ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
LIF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- -29.45%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- -25.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTJ vs. LIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 0.04% | 6.89% | 2.20% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | -29.45% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTJ and LIF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTJ vs. LIF — Risk / Return Rank
IBTJ
LIF
IBTJ vs. LIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTJ | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.97 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | -0.43 | +2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | -0.70 | +6.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTJ vs. LIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, smaller than the maximum LIF drawdown of -65.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and LIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTJ | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.19% | -65.64% | +45.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -65.64% | +64.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -59.19% | +53.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -21.35% | +11.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 40.82% | -40.23% |
Volatility
IBTJ vs. LIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.69%, while Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a volatility of 16.67%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTJ | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 16.67% | -15.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.58% | 52.85% | -51.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36% | 67.08% | -64.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 62.97% | -57.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 62.97% | -56.99% |
Dividends
IBTJ vs. LIF - Dividend Comparison
IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 1.86% | 0.74% | 0.61% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTJ and LIF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.67%) compared to IBTJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs LIF's -65.64%.
IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTJ and LIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer