IBTJ vs. IBTL
IBTJ (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF) and IBTL (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from iShares - IBTJ tracks the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index while IBTL tracks the ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBTJ returned 3.66%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for IBTL. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
IBTJ vs. IBTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than IBTL's -0.47% return.
IBTJ
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 2.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTL
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTJ vs. IBTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | -0.05% | 6.89% | 1.82% | 4.49% | -12.45% | -1.51% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | -0.47% | 7.85% | 0.36% | 3.60% | -15.60% | -1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTJ and IBTL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IBTJ and IBTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTJ vs. IBTL — Risk / Return Rank
IBTJ
IBTL
IBTJ vs. IBTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTJ | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 0.97 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 2.56 | +2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTJ vs. IBTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, roughly equal to the maximum IBTL drawdown of -20.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and IBTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTJ | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.19% | -20.93% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -2.83% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.43% | -7.38% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -7.25% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.70% | -11.41% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 1.08% | -0.46% |
Volatility
IBTJ vs. IBTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.72%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTJ | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 1.07% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.64% | 2.49% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40% | 3.53% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 7.43% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 7.43% | -1.45% |
IBTJ vs. IBTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBTJ and IBTL have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTJ vs. IBTL - Dividend Comparison
IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than IBTL's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 1.86% | 0.74% | 0.61% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | 3.97% | 3.93% | 4.07% | 3.04% | 2.36% | 0.70% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IBTJ and IBTL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBTL has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to IBTJ (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs IBTL's -20.93%.
On 3-year performance, IBTJ leads with 3.66% vs 2.92% for IBTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. On volatility, IBTJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBTJ has performed better with a 3.66% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTJ and IBTL have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
IBTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 3.81% for IBTJ.
IBTJ tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBTL tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index.
IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTJ and IBTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer