IBTG vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBTG (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTG is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBTG returned 0.84%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. IBTG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

IBTG vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.

IBTG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 4.11%
• 5Y*: 0.84%
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 64.22%
• 6M: 60.70%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTG vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF	1.44%	4.40%	3.97%	4.34%	-8.18%	-3.04%	3.99%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	64.22%	-11.86%	8.18%	-0.97%	27.57%	63.71%	-47.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTG and OILK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020	-0.11

Return for Risk

IBTG vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTG

IBTG Risk / Return Rank: 99
IBTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IBTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBTG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
IBTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
IBTG Martin Ratio Rank: 99

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTG vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBTG	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	8.02	2.06	+5.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	20.36	2.59	+17.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.40	1.34	+3.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	63.59	3.42	+60.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	256.63	6.91	+249.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBTG vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTG Sharpe Ratio is 8.02, which is higher than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTG and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBTG	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.02	2.06	+5.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.59	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.12	+0.17

Drawdowns

IBTG vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBTG	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.62%	-83.76%	+70.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.07%	-17.35%	+17.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.33%	-23.42%	+22.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.31%	-34.69%	+22.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.66%	+3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-32.61%	+27.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	8.56%	-8.54%

Volatility

IBTG vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) is 0.12%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that IBTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBTG	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.12%	10.44%	-10.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.32%	23.26%	-22.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52%	28.75%	-28.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.27%	30.12%	-26.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.45%	35.97%	-32.52%

IBTG vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBTG vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF	3.96%	4.03%	4.08%	3.61%	2.06%	0.66%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.18%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBTG and OILK in my portfolio?

IBTG and OILK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBTG or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to IBTG (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTG dropped -13.62% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, IBTG or OILK?

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 0.84% for IBTG. On fees, IBTG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTG has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBTG or OILK?

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBTG or OILK?

IBTG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBTG or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 3.96% for IBTG.

What is the main difference between IBTG and OILK?

IBTG is categorized as Government Bonds, while OILK is Oil & Gas. IBTG tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTG and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.02 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.