IBTG vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBTG (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTG is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBTG returned 4.14% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IBTG charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

IBTG vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTG achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.

IBTG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 4.11%
• 5Y*: 0.84%
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -18.50%
• YTD: -25.48%
• 6M: -29.84%
• 1Y: -38.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTG vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF	1.44%	4.40%	3.83%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-25.48%	-6.41%	99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTG and IBIT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	-0.08

The correlation between IBTG and IBIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IBTG vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTG

IBTG Risk / Return Rank: 99
IBTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IBTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBTG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
IBTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
IBTG Martin Ratio Rank: 99

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTG vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBTG	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	8.02	-0.89	+8.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	20.36	-1.23	+21.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.40	0.86	+3.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	63.59	-0.79	+64.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	256.63	-1.36	+257.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBTG vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTG Sharpe Ratio is 8.02, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTG and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBTG	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.02	-0.89	+8.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.30	-0.01

Drawdowns

IBTG vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTG drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBTG	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.62%	-49.36%	+35.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.07%	-49.36%	+49.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-48.10%	+48.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-16.02%	+11.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	28.44%	-28.42%

Volatility

IBTG vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) is 0.12%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IBTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBTG	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.12%	9.50%	-9.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.32%	34.44%	-34.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52%	43.73%	-43.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.27%	50.19%	-46.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.45%	50.19%	-46.74%

IBTG vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBTG vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF	3.96%	4.03%	4.08%	3.61%	2.06%	0.66%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBTG and IBIT in my portfolio?

IBTG and IBIT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBTG or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IBTG (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTG dropped -13.62% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

Which ETF is better, IBTG or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, IBTG leads with 4.14% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBTG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTG has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBTG or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, IBTG has performed better with a 4.14% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBTG or IBIT?

IBTG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBTG or IBIT?

IBTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between IBTG and IBIT?

IBTG is categorized as Government Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IBTG tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTG and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.02 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.