PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IBND vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IBND vs. XLE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBND is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBND returned 0.65%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for XLE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.

Performance

IBND vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IBND has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 0.65%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.

IBND

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-1.08%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
0.65%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBND vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF		-1.08%16.17%-2.81%10.38%-19.44%-8.40%11.50%4.41%-6.15%14.84%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF		32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IBND and XLE is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2010

0.09

The correlation between IBND and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF

Often compared with IBND:
IBND vs. IAGGIBND vs. BWXIBND vs. BNDXIBND vs. DGCFXIBND vs. VGCAXIBND vs. SUSCIBND vs. SPAB
Often compared with XLE:
XLE vs. VDEXLE vs. USOXLE vs. XOPXLE vs. XLUXLE vs. XLKXLE vs. IXCXLE vs. FENY

Return for Risk

IBND vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IBND
IBND Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBND Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBND Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBND vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IBNDXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.36
2.21

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.58
2.84

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.75

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

10.92

-9.76

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBND vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBND and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IBNDXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.21

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.79

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.35

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.31

-0.16

Drawdowns

IBND vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and XLE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IBNDXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-71.26%

+35.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-12.05%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.18%

-20.14%

+10.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-26.04%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.62%

-66.81%

+31.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.45%

-6.15%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-17.98%

+7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

4.14%

-1.68%

Volatility

IBND vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) is 2.04%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that IBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IBNDXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

8.25%

-6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

16.58%

-10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

20.53%

-12.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.74%

26.02%

-16.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.94%

29.59%

-20.65%

IBND vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBND vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF		2.74%2.49%2.61%2.08%0.54%0.38%0.45%0.67%0.71%0.34%0.01%0.01%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF		2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

IBND and XLE have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to IBND (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBND dropped -35.62% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.22% vs 0.65% for IBND. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IBND has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 0.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBND.

IBND has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.

IBND is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. IBND tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBND and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBND and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer