IBND vs. BWZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ).

IBND and BWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. It was launched on May 19, 2010. BWZ is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized. It was launched on Jan 15, 2009. Both IBND and BWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IBND vs. BWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IBND vs. BWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF	-2.80%	16.17%	-2.81%	10.38%	-19.44%	-8.40%	11.50%	4.41%	-6.15%	14.84%
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF	-1.47%	10.47%	-5.31%	2.97%	-10.56%	-6.85%	6.47%	0.99%	-3.36%	10.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -2.80% return, which is significantly lower than BWZ's -1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IBND has outperformed BWZ with an annualized return of 0.50%, while BWZ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.56% annualized return.

IBND

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -4.53%
• YTD: -2.80%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: -1.27%
• 10Y*: 0.50%

BWZ

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -3.02%
• YTD: -1.47%
• 6M: -2.27%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: 1.67%
• 5Y*: -1.67%
• 10Y*: -0.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBND vs. BWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BWZ's 0.35% expense ratio.

IBND

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF

BWZ

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF

Return for Risk

IBND vs. BWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBND

IBND Risk / Return Rank: 49
IBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
IBND Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
IBND Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BWZ

BWZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
BWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
BWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBND vs. BWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBND	BWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.59	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	0.92	+0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.11	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	0.76	+0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.91	2.05	+1.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBND vs. BWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the BWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBND and BWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBND	BWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	0.59	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	-0.22	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06	-0.08	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	-0.03	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between IBND and BWZ is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IBND vs. BWZ - Dividend Comparison

IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than BWZ's 2.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF	2.65%	2.49%	2.61%	2.08%	0.54%	0.38%	0.45%	0.67%	0.71%	0.34%	0.01%	0.01%
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF	2.05%	2.05%	2.47%	1.63%	0.44%	0.60%	0.13%	0.43%	1.10%	0.40%	0.13%	0.06%

Drawdowns

IBND vs. BWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, roughly equal to the maximum BWZ drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and BWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBND	BWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.62%	-34.23%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.75%	-5.15%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.32%	-23.72%	-10.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.62%	-24.90%	-10.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.03%	-23.06%	+12.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.65%	-16.04%	+5.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.92%	+0.11%

Volatility

IBND vs. BWZ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) at 2.80%. This indicates that IBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBND	BWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	2.80%	+1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.56%	4.76%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.92%	7.82%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.70%	7.56%	+2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.94%	6.96%	+1.98%